tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5881301417977354358.post1895351820186915565..comments2023-06-07T06:49:25.681-05:00Comments on The Singing Bones: It ain't right....ana-bhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06918502866288050783noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5881301417977354358.post-91057995021949304452012-12-23T15:01:35.521-06:002012-12-23T15:01:35.521-06:00Thanks the info. No I haven't heard the Booker...Thanks the info. No I haven't heard the Booker issue yet, so that's news to me.<br /><br />Good to know the date on 302 as well. Until now I hadn't seen anything to suggest that any secular recordings were issued on Booker after 1964.ana-bhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06918502866288050783noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5881301417977354358.post-67122570727646476592012-12-20T16:36:05.496-06:002012-12-20T16:36:05.496-06:00It's a while since this was posted, so maybe y...It's a while since this was posted, so maybe you already found out, but the versions (of both sides of the 45) are the same on Booker and C&E (to my ears at least). The next number in the Booker discography (302) dates from 1965/66, so the C&E 45 seems to be a reissue of 10 year old recordings.Peternoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5881301417977354358.post-28387914533624168332011-04-09T19:09:36.481-05:002011-04-09T19:09:36.481-05:00Great side. Thank you! I'm enjoying it quite a...Great side. Thank you! I'm enjoying it quite a bit.<br /> The only thing I know about Chuck Johnson is what I've read on your blog. I've only heard three songs by him and I got them all here.Jemhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12805845473590793232noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5881301417977354358.post-32551614383984981832011-04-07T09:43:40.352-05:002011-04-07T09:43:40.352-05:00Isosceles...C&E 530 is of early 80s vintage. I...Isosceles...C&E 530 is of early 80s vintage. I imagine the label was started up again using the higher numbers. There are non-Johnson C&Es. I don't own either of them but a couple of very fine brass band records come to mind. I've never heard the record but yeah "The Best Of Chuck Johnson" is indeed the title of the song. <br /><br />Anon...You're most welcome.ana-bhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06918502866288050783noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5881301417977354358.post-65225777374107157072011-04-07T05:53:16.595-05:002011-04-07T05:53:16.595-05:00thank you so muchthank you so muchAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5881301417977354358.post-3237994798492344392011-04-06T23:57:29.521-05:002011-04-06T23:57:29.521-05:00Cool record!
Sadly, I don't know much about C...Cool record!<br /><br />Sadly, I don't know much about Chuck J. and hadn't heard of C&E until now. Well, I guess 50 years ago the phrase "nearly ungoogleable" was not a thought in anyone's mind when naming their labels!<br /><br />I did see a few listed in the 'outta stock' section @ recordsbymail when I looked for Chuck Johnson there...<br /><br />400 - Way You Treat Me / Your Little World<br />401 - Elephant Fair / Tryin Hard to Forget<br />403 - In Flight / The Best of Chuck Johnson (?!)<br />530 - Tell Me / Instrumental<br /><br />But searching for just 'C&E' was failing on there, so who knows if there are any non-Chuck ones?<br /><br />And...tag! Somebody else is It!Isosceles Diegohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10801529573997553239noreply@blogger.com